Lifewaster
06-02-07, 02:21
Maybe useful to give results of nanite tests , even if not a bug.
Heres some findings using the SPY protection tools
TL 76.8 SPIT basic protection tool (highest TL of the Combo Resist Shields that use BAT(protector),EAR (absorber) or FAP(deflector)
(1)
Tests Using basic FAP ammo for deflector effect of force/pierce :
When fired once (25 overload) = 3% shields
Damage: 143.078 Target Piercing HitZone 0 - Part 0
Damage: 138.288 (Reduction: 4.791 - 3.348 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
When fired 3 times (75 overload) = 7% shield effect
Damage: 99.360 Target Piercing HitZone 1 - Part 0
Damage: 92.396 (Reduction: 6.964 - 7.009 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
(2)
Tests using BAT modded ammo for Protector effect of fire/poison :
When fired once (25 overload) = 3% shield
Damage: 143.078 Target Poison HitZone 0 - Part 1
Damage: 138.366 (Reduction: 4.713 - 3.294 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
When fired 3 times (75 overload) = 10% shield
Damage: 59.580 Target Poison HitZone 3 - Part 0
Damage: 53.618 (Reduction: 5.962 - 10.006 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
So is it better to avoid using either of these and instead use a basic deflector and protector for a higher shield.
Well testing using basic deflector and protector
Deflector : 6%
Damage: 119.232 Target Piercing HitZone 1 - Part 0
Damage: 111.777 (Reduction: 7.455 - 6.253 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
Protector : 8%
Damage: 119.232 Target Poison HitZone 1 - Part 1
Damage: 109.596 (Reduction: 9.636 - 8.082 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
So overall it seems roughly the same overall protection with a deflector/protector as if you overload to 150 with a triple shot of nanite deflector (FAP) and nanite protector (BAT)
######
Ideally a spy might like to use a PSI deflector/protector + a quadruple shot of nanite absorber (EAR) . However this is not possible since you cant cast any of the nanite shield whilst using any of the Psi shields or vice versa.
######
So in order to use a nanite absorber, you would have to forgoe any psi shields and basically share your overload between the 3 nanite shields , ie 2 shots of each of FAP/EAR/BAT . This will result in shields of about 6% vs all 3 types .....at a cost of having 13 buff icons on your screen :p
I imagine most spies will prefer to just go with deflector/absorber as it really doesnt seem worth the nanite bother to just add some 6% vs energy/xray overall ?
######
Note I havent tested the single shield versions , which may be stronger since they go to a higher tl 100 vs the tl 76 combo versions.
Will update with those findings soon.........
Heres some findings using the SPY protection tools
TL 76.8 SPIT basic protection tool (highest TL of the Combo Resist Shields that use BAT(protector),EAR (absorber) or FAP(deflector)
(1)
Tests Using basic FAP ammo for deflector effect of force/pierce :
When fired once (25 overload) = 3% shields
Damage: 143.078 Target Piercing HitZone 0 - Part 0
Damage: 138.288 (Reduction: 4.791 - 3.348 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
When fired 3 times (75 overload) = 7% shield effect
Damage: 99.360 Target Piercing HitZone 1 - Part 0
Damage: 92.396 (Reduction: 6.964 - 7.009 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
(2)
Tests using BAT modded ammo for Protector effect of fire/poison :
When fired once (25 overload) = 3% shield
Damage: 143.078 Target Poison HitZone 0 - Part 1
Damage: 138.366 (Reduction: 4.713 - 3.294 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
When fired 3 times (75 overload) = 10% shield
Damage: 59.580 Target Poison HitZone 3 - Part 0
Damage: 53.618 (Reduction: 5.962 - 10.006 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
So is it better to avoid using either of these and instead use a basic deflector and protector for a higher shield.
Well testing using basic deflector and protector
Deflector : 6%
Damage: 119.232 Target Piercing HitZone 1 - Part 0
Damage: 111.777 (Reduction: 7.455 - 6.253 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
Protector : 8%
Damage: 119.232 Target Poison HitZone 1 - Part 1
Damage: 109.596 (Reduction: 9.636 - 8.082 Percentage) - Damage reduced by shield
So overall it seems roughly the same overall protection with a deflector/protector as if you overload to 150 with a triple shot of nanite deflector (FAP) and nanite protector (BAT)
######
Ideally a spy might like to use a PSI deflector/protector + a quadruple shot of nanite absorber (EAR) . However this is not possible since you cant cast any of the nanite shield whilst using any of the Psi shields or vice versa.
######
So in order to use a nanite absorber, you would have to forgoe any psi shields and basically share your overload between the 3 nanite shields , ie 2 shots of each of FAP/EAR/BAT . This will result in shields of about 6% vs all 3 types .....at a cost of having 13 buff icons on your screen :p
I imagine most spies will prefer to just go with deflector/absorber as it really doesnt seem worth the nanite bother to just add some 6% vs energy/xray overall ?
######
Note I havent tested the single shield versions , which may be stronger since they go to a higher tl 100 vs the tl 76 combo versions.
Will update with those findings soon.........